
A | China's Ministry of Justice on Wednesday said that the European Union's (EU's) recent cross-border investigation into Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com under its Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) has constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction. The ministry said in a statement that no organization or individual may comply with or assist in implementing the EU's unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures. The ministry's statement came after the European Commission announced an investigation into JD.com's proposed takeover of German retailer Ceconomy in May. In the statement, the ministry said the conclusion followed an investigation conducted under China's rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures, which were issued in April this year. According to the rules, the Chinese government has the authority to take countermeasures in response to extraterritorial jurisdiction measures by a foreign country that violate international law and the basic norms governing international relations and that harm China's sovereignty, security and development interests, or the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens and organizations. In May, citing the same set of rules, the ministry said that the EU's probe into Chinese security check company Nuctech constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction. A spokesperson with the Ministry of Justice on Wednesday said the EU's probe, under the bloc's FSR effective since 2023, has arbitrarily demanded broad and unnecessary information located in China, which is a serious violation of the international rule of law. "China will resolutely take countermeasures in accordance with the law if the EU side were to insist on the wrong course," the spokesperson said. The spokesperson urged the EU to immediately correct its wrong practices, stop abusing the FSR as a tool, and foster a fair, impartial and predictable environment for companies investing and operating in the EU market.
。 北京时间8月23日,乔纳森·库明加的自由市场局势已经明朗,湖人与森林狼成为他下家的两大最终竞争者。
让人意外的是,两支球队都向库明加许下承诺,新赛季会给他首发席位。不过两份邀约的薪资待遇差距巨大。

B | 湖人要依靠签换交易才能得到他,可以开出金额更高的合同。

C | 反观森林狼,受薪金空间约束,只能提供老将底薪。 即便薪资有限,但森林狼的战术体系被外界认为和库明加的球风十分适配。一边是高薪首发,一边是体系契合的底薪,库明加需要权衡利弊做出最终决定。
Current article:http://uh4.tandianxiuzhutiaoshoudiamei.pics/news/20260826_5066.html
Published on:22:59:07